The National Identity of Russia
What is National
identity? National identity is an illogical bound an individual have with its
fellow nation members, a sense of belonging one have to a group of individuals.
It plays a crucial factor in uniting the people of a national state.
(Triandafyllidou, 1998, p.595) In the case of Russia this sense of belonging is
greatly tied to its troubled past. The Russian identity is very much a new
national identity that emerged in the late 1980’s, basing itself off Soviet and
Pre-Imperial identity traits. Through drawing from pre-soviet Russian traits
and maintaining a powerful external other, the Russian identity is able to
quickly reassert its distinctiveness following the collapse of the Soviet
Identity.
Religion
Nowadays the religion
that defines Russia is Orthodox. Currently more than half of Russia belong to
the Russian Orthodox church. Despite its status withing Russia nowadays, its
rise to popularity is not all smooth sailing. Throughout Russia’s existence as
a part of the Soviet Union, official policy was largely against traditional
religion. Within the Soviet Union Communism act as a quasi-religion with its
own distinct set of symbols, rights, and doctrines. To prevent competition with the communist
ideology the Soviet Union unofficially adopted the policy of State atheism and
set up a variety of legislation to prosecute believers for their (real or
perceived) opposition to the state ideology and policy. This harsh policy
resulted in a state that mostly practices atheism. However, this status come to
a turning point in the late 1980’s. “At the same time, public interest
in religious issues and the public prestige of religion increased dramatically,
galvanized by the simple fact that state control was removed.”
(Agadjanian, 2001). Following this
period Russia simultaneously experienced an secularization from the Communism
and a revival of Russian Orthodox. The practice of Russian Orthodox is an
identity traceable back to the 1400’s, when the Moscow church unofficially
became independent by installing its own bishop without consent from consent
from Constantinople. Russian Orthodox Church was then tied with the Russian
identity until the formation of USSR. Russian Orthodox gained much momentum in
recent years. In 2006 an estimated 15-20% of Russians practice Orthodox,
whereas 15 years later in 2021 a poll conducted by researchers found 63% of
Russians self-identify as an Orthodox practitioner. (fbi, 2022) The identity
and practice of Orthodox helped Russia to distinguish itself from the west,
which practice Catholic or Protestant. “Three sources of danger to the
integrity of Russian culture are said to be Islam, Western mainstream
denominations (both Catholic and Protes- tant), and new religious movements of
Western origin” according to traditionalists in 1997’s Russia. The Orthodox
Church is to Russians not merely a religion but also an identity by which they
can differentiate themselves from their primary national “other”—the west. To
differentiate itself from the western variants of Christianity Russian orthodox
have several distinct features: Russian Orthodox view traditions to be equally
a revelation as scriptures whereas other western branches only value
scriptures, Virgin Mary don’t have a role in salvation, and Adam and Eve only
bring death to the world compared to the western branches believe in original
sin (change of human nature). These differences help draw the line between “The
Russian Christianity” and “Western Christianity”, Making it a perfect anchor
for a (perceived) distinct and authentic Russian identity. More radical
viewpoints in Russia regard the practice of Orthodox as a "reliable
barrier against the destruction of Russian statehood, the ideological
aggression of westernization and liberalism," and then turns against any
kind of Western religious presence as conveying "values openly
contradictory to the most important Christian principles and to
sacredness". This led to the biggest “other” in the Russian identity: the
West.
Also a fun link showcasing some of the distinct
features of Russian Orthodox Church: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/06/24/news-from-russia-what-you-missed-over-the-weekend-16-a66115
The National Other Of Russia: The West
An “other” is a group a
nation want to prove different from. Authenticity is a relative term; one
cannot be unique if there is no one to compare to. The “other” of a nation is
one that threatens or perceived to be threatening to the authenticity of the
in-group, harm its interest, or outright threaten its physical security. From
the perspective of Russia, the west fits all three criteria. “from the time of
Peter Russia defined itself in opposition to 'the West' as its significant other”
(Duncan, 2005). The antagonization of the west is one of the most-if not the
most important aspect in creating the Russian identity. In 1991 when the Soviet
Union collapsed, the new form Russia reach for the west for economic advising. With
the help of western economists Russia adopted the “shock therapy”: rapid privatization
of previously state owned enterprises. This era is characterized by widespread
corruption withing the Russian government and the rise of oligarchs: business
figures that monopolized the means of production. Eventually in 1998 the Russian
currency (Ruble) collapsed, leaving the entire economy in shambled,
significantly affecting the living standard of common Russians. The failure of “shock
therapy” created widespread resentment against the west, who help formulated
the plan. This resentment then embedded into the newly formed Russian identity.
“Many Russian nationalists see Russia as a victim of a Western, or sometimes
Jewish, conspiracy to destroy the USSR and thereby to weaken the Russian economy”.
Russians also perceive the west as a direct threat to their security. After the
collapse of the Soviet Union, Russia seek to maintain its security by maintaining
a sphere of influence, notably in ex-Soviet
states. This comes at the cost of Russia’s smaller neighbors, hence NATO
rejected this proposal and granted many ex-eastern block states NATO membership.
Most notably the 3 Baltic states, Previously a part of the Soviet Union, they
are now firmly allied with the west and hold NATO military exercise annually. Russians
view this loss of buffer space a betrayal from the west. “Even among liberal
Russians, a feeling of betrayal …by the West at the enlargement of NATO into Eastern
Europe”. Russia is also in a constant state of internal debate
on whether it should westernize or follow its own tradition, perceived as
“unique”. While westernization is often seen as been progressive, pushback to
preserve “Russianness” is no rare sighting. One notable way Russia distinct
itself from the west culturally is by taking a conservative approach to
contemporary issues as apposed to the more liberal view the west holds. This led
to the passing of anti LGBTQ laws, conservative view on gender right…etc.
References
Agadjanian, A. (2001). Public Religion and the
Quest for National Ideology: Russia's Media Discourse. Journal for the Scientific
Study of Religion, 40(3), 351-366.
Triandafyllidou, A. (1998). National identity
and the 'other'. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 21(4), 593-612.
Duncan, P. (2005). CONTEMPORARY RUSSIAN
IDENTITY BETWEEN EAST AND WEST. The Historical Journal, 48(1), 277-294.
Central Intelligence Agency. (n.d.). Russia.
Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved February 10, 2022, from
https://www.cia.gov/the-world-factbook/countries/russia/#people-and-society
The Moscow Times. (2022, February 11). News
from Russia: What you missed over the weekend. The Moscow Times. Retrieved
February 11, 2022, from
https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2019/06/24/news-from-russia-what-you-missed-over-the-weekend-16-a66115
评论
发表评论